Comments on: Why Our Website Sucks http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/why-our-website-sucks/ People Deserve Better Software Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:58:50 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Our site “sucks” no more! « Anthony’s Blog http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/why-our-website-sucks/#comment-4685 Our site “sucks” no more! « Anthony’s Blog Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:31:17 +0000 http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-4685 [...] an earlier post, I talked about the difficulties we were experiencing with designing and building our own website. [...] [...] an earlier post, I talked about the difficulties we were experiencing with designing and building our own website. [...]

]]> By: make your own website http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/why-our-website-sucks/#comment-4684 make your own website Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:30:16 +0000 http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-4684 hi, interesting information you got on web sites, but can you make money or on this technology? i’m not tolking rich but supplemental income. Which is better HTML or PHP or Flash? What i mean is easier to build/create? thanks, good post hi, interesting information you got on web sites, but can you make money or on this technology? i’m not tolking rich but supplemental income. Which is better HTML or PHP or Flash? What i mean is easier to build/create? thanks, good post

]]> By: anthonyfranco http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/why-our-website-sucks/#comment-4592 anthonyfranco Wed, 13 May 2009 03:32:34 +0000 http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-4592 Esk, - Good points, and you are right, UM's site is good. I guess I never really thought of them as an "Interactive Agency" - perhaps I should re-evaluate that. (also, my comment about everybody else's site was obviously a little tongue and cheek) I think I explained my point about outsourcing pretty well above, lets just say that we had a good healthy debate about it internally and netted out that we should do it ourselves. I tried to make no excuses or disagree with the negative comments on our site. I simply thought this would be interesting insight into how even the best of us can struggle now and then... Esk,
- Good points, and you are right, UM’s site is good. I guess I never really thought of them as an “Interactive Agency” – perhaps I should re-evaluate that. (also, my comment about everybody else’s site was obviously a little tongue and cheek)
I think I explained my point about outsourcing pretty well above, lets just say that we had a good healthy debate about it internally and netted out that we should do it ourselves.

I tried to make no excuses or disagree with the negative comments on our site. I simply thought this would be interesting insight into how even the best of us can struggle now and then…

]]> By: Esk http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/2009/05/12/why-our-website-sucks/#comment-4591 Esk Wed, 13 May 2009 02:08:38 +0000 http://anthonyfranco.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-4591 I disagree with your comment "I believe this is the reason why most other interactive agencies’ websites suck as well :)" - I think Universal Mind (Just on example) has done an excellent job of developing a sleek website in Flex. What would be wrong with outsourcing it? You're a web application development firm - your core business is not 'Web Design'. People might talk if you outsourced it - but I believe 'flastrophe' is worse than the negative PR that could be if outsourced. I disagree with your comment “I believe this is the reason why most other interactive agencies’ websites suck as well :)” – I think Universal Mind (Just on example) has done an excellent job of developing a sleek website in Flex. What would be wrong with outsourcing it? You’re a web application development firm – your core business is not ‘Web Design’. People might talk if you outsourced it – but I believe ‘flastrophe’ is worse than the negative PR that could be if outsourced.

]]>